Professional Experience
Mr. Thies has litigated complex commercial disputes and defended class actions throughout the state of Illinois, and in federal courts across the country, including the First, Second, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits. He has represented clients in numerous trials and arbitrations, including serving as part of a trial team winning a $64 million judgment after a jury verdict in the Northern District of New York.
Prior to joining Webber & Thies, Mr. Thies was an associate at Sidley Austin LLP (2013-2018) and clerked for Chief Judge James F. Holderman of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (2011-2013) and for Judge Jerry Smith of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (2010-2011).
Education
- J.D., magna cum laude, Harvard Law School, 2010
- B.A., magna cum laude, Yale University, 2007
- Light Fellow, for study of Mandarin Chinese at Beijing Normal University, 2005
Bar Admissions
- Illinois, 2010
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 2011
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, 2011 (General Bar) & 2018 (Trial Bar)
- U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, 2014
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 2015
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 2016
- U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 2016
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, 2016
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 2017
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, 2018
- U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois, 2018
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois, 2019
Professional Activities
- Mr. Thies is the Vice Chair of the Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education & Admissions to the Bar, the nationally recognized accrediting body for American law schools. He also currently serves as a member of the finance and governance committees of the Council, as Chair of the Standards Committee and as Co-Chair of the Strategic Review Committee.
- Mr. Thies is a member of the ISBA’s Federal Civil Practice Section Council (Chair, 2021-22) and the ISBA Standing Committee on Legal Education, Admission, & Competence (Chair, 2016-17). He has also served as Co-Chair (2020-21) and Chair (2021-22) of the ISBA Standing Committee on the Rural Practice Initiative.
- Mr. Thies served as the Reporter for the 2009-2010 ABA Presidential Commission on the Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Profession and Legal Needs, and as the Reporter for the 2012-2013 ISBA Special Committee on the Impact of Law School Debt on the Delivery of Legal Service. He has also represented Illinois as a delegate in the ABA Young Lawyers Division Assembly.
- Mr. Thies has served as an adjunct professor at the UIC John Marshall Law School, teaching intellectual property trial advocacy.
Civic and Philanthropic Involvement
- Mr. Thies is the Chair of the Champaign-Urbana Schools Foundation Board.
- He is a graduate of the 2019 Emerging Community Leaders Program through the United Way of Champaign County.
- He is a member of the Sixth Judicial Circuit Pro Bono Committee and volunteers as a pro bono attorney through the Sixth Judicial Circuit Self-Represented Litigant Help Desk.
- Mr. Thies serves as an Elder at the All Souls Presbyterian Church in Champaign-Urbana.
Personal
Mr. Thies and his wife Page reside in Champaign with their three sons and two daughters.
Daniel R. Thies
Shareholder
Areas of Practice
Five Things Most People Don’t Know About Daniel
1One of Daniel’s first jobs was at the Old Faithful Inn in Yellowstone National Park.
2Daniel was President of the Yale Political Union in 2007, a post also held by John Kerry, Fareed Zakaria, Ed Meese, William Bundy, and Michael Astrue.
3Daniel has summited one of the Grand Tetons.
4At Yale, Daniel lived in the same entryway that was used to portray the on-campus home of (fictional) Rory Gilmore from The Gilmore Girls.
5Daniel’s five children are the tenth generation of his family to live in Champaign County.
Publications
Mr. Thies has frequently written on topics of interest to the profession (and public):
Proposed Changes to FRAP 3 Face Rare Pushback From Judiciary
Ill. St. Bar Ass’n Fed. Civ. Prac. Newsl. | June 2020
Filing under seal in federal court: A suggestion for reform
Ill. St. Bar Ass’n Fed. Civ. Prac. Newsl. | June 2019
Which Default Rule Applies When an Arbitration Agreement Does Not Address Class Arbitration?
46 PREVIEW U.S. SUP. CT. CAS. 7 | Nov. 2018
Who Decides Arbitrability When the Demand for Arbitration is Wholly Groundless?
46 PREVIEW U.S. SUP. CT. CAS. 4 | Nov. 2018
Why ESI is Not Like Fine Wine: Recent Changes to the Ancient Documents Exception to the Hearsay Rule
Ill. St. Bar Ass’n Fed. Civ. Prac. Newsl. | 2018
Recent developments in the Seventh Circuit’s class action jurisprudence: Not as pro-plaintiff as they first appear
Ill. St. Bar Ass’n Fed. Civ. Prac. Newsl. | 2016
Is the Supreme Court ‘Pro-Arbitration’? The Answer is More Complicated Than You Think
Sidley Austin LLP Ins. & Reins. Law Report | 2016
Deposition objections: Are you saying too much? Or too little?
Ill. St. Bar Ass’n Fed. Civ. Prac. Newsl. | 2015
Does Equity Allow an ERISA Plan to Seek Reimbursement from a Participant’s General Assets?
43 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 56 | 2015
Bar examination scores decline, presenting a challenge for law schools-and for the profession
Ill. St. Bar Ass’n YLD Newsl. | 2015
Recent Developments in Pre-Judgment Challenges to Arbitrator Bias
Sidley Austin LLP, Ins. & Reins. Law Report | 2014
Comcast’s Lasting Impact: Crystallization and Affirmation of the Rule 23(b)(3) Predominance Requirement
15 BNA Class Action Litigation Report 574 | 2014 | co-authored with Joel Feldman
Are Appropriations That Have Already Been Spent “Available” to Pay a Government Contract?
39 PREVIEW U.S. SUP. CT. CAS. 251 | 2012
Rethinking Legal Education in Hard Times: The Recession, Legal Education, and the New Job Market
59 J. LEGAL EDUC. 597 | 2010
Comment, The Decline of the Ct. of Federal Claims in Neb. Pub. Power Dist. v. U.S., 590 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
33 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL’Y 1203 | 2010
May an Indian Tribe Simultaneously Sue the United States in Two Forums for One Breach of Trust?
38 PREVIEW U.S. SUP. CT. CAS. 60 | 2010